31	RAM KISTO MANDAL AND ANR. Vs. DHANKISTO MANDAL	Coram: SHELAT, J.M.	15/07/1968	Sonthal Parganas Settlement Regulation 3 of 1872--Certain transfers of land barred by s. 27 of Regulation-Exchange of land whether such transfer-High Court must take notice of plea even if not raised at earlier stage-Burden of proving that	A widow with a life estate in certain raiyati lands in the Sonthal Parganas in Bihar exchanged a part of the lands for other lands. After her death her husband's reversioners filed a suit challenging this exchange as well as certain other tr	Click here to see Subject, Head Notes, Citation and Judgement
32	MALOJIRAO NARASINGHRAO SHITOLE Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH	Coram: MITTER, G.K.	07/03/1969	Madhya Bharat Abolition of Jagirs Act 28 of 1951, s. 29- Appeal to Board of Revenue-No provision in Act for exclusion of time for obtaining copies or to condone delay S. 30 of Act makining Ryotwari Land Revenue and Tenancy Act Samwat 2007 ap	Section 29 of the Madhya Bharat Abolition of Jagirs Act 28 of 1951 provided for appeals against orders of the Jagir Commissioner to the Board of Revenue. The appeal was to be filed within 90 days of the communication of the decision to the p	Click here to see Subject, Head Notes, Citation and Judgement
33	NITYANANDA M. JOSHI & ORS. Vs. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS.	Coram: SIKRI, S.M.	25/04/1969	Industrial Disputes Act (14 of 1947), s. 33C(2)-Applications for computing benefit of holidays in terms of money- Maintainability. Indian Limitation Act (36 of 1963), Art. 137-Applications to Labour Court-If covered by Article.	The appellants (employees of the respondent) filed applications against the respondent, under s. 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for computing in terms of money, the benefit of holidays, and for recovering the amount.	Click here to see Subject, Head Notes, Citation and Judgement
34	MOHD. ZAINULABUDEEN (SINCE DECEASED) BY L.RS. Vs. SAYED AHMED MOHINDEEN AND ORS.	Coram: KASLIWAL, N.M. (J)	15/12/1989	Indian Limitation Act, 1963: Adverse possession--Claim of Among co-heirs there must be evidence of an essertion of hostile title coupled with possession and enjoyment	Mohd. Zainulabdeen and Yasin By filed a suit for decla- ration that they were entitled to be in enjoyment and pos- session of Saint Syeed Moosa Shah Khadiri Dargah in Madras for 27 days and to restrain the defendants from interfering with til	Click here to see Subject, Head Notes, Citation and Judgement
35	THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI Vs. SMT. SUSHILA DEVI & ORS.	Coram: A.P.MISRA, R.C.LAHOTI	07/05/1999	Torts-Negligence-Fall of a branch of a dead and dried tree on the deceased while he was riding a scooter, crushing his head and resulting in his death the next day-Horticulture department of the Corporation failing to carry out periodical inspecti	Dismissing both the appeals, this Court HELD : 1.1. The Municipal Corporation was negligent in performing its duty under the common law and therefore liable in damages to the plaintiffs for the injury caused to the deceased by fall of the branch	Click here to see Subject, Head Notes, Citation and Judgement
36	P.T. Munichikkanna Reddy & Ors Vs. Revamma and Ors	Coram: S.B. Sinha , Markandey Katju	24/04/2007	Limitation Act, 1963-Articles 64 & 65 of the Schedule-Indian Limitation Act, 1908-Articles 142 & 143 of the Schedule-Purchase of suit property by plaintiffs by registered sale deeds without knowledge of earlier purchase of the same by defendants-Suit	Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1. Adverse possession is based on the theory or presumption that the owner has abandoned the property to the adverse possessor on the acquiescence of the owner to the hostile acts and claims of the person i	Click here to see Subject, Head Notes, Citation and Judgement