31VELAMURI VENKATA SIVAPRASAD (DEAD) BY L.RS. Vs. KOTHURI VENKATESWARLU (DEAD) BY L.RS. AND ORS.Coram: S.B. MAJMUDAR , M. SRINIVASAN , UMESH C. BANERJEE24/11/1999Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Section 14(1)-Limited estate/interest of widow-Re-marriage of widow before coming into force-of 1956 Act-Effect of-Held, re-marriage divesting widow as limited owner of estate of her deceased husband-Section 14(1) notAllowing the appeal, the Court HELD : 1. The effect of re-marriage is available in the Hindu Widow's Re- marriage Act, 1856. Section 2 of the 1856 Act has taken away the right of widow in the event of re-marriage and the statute is very specificClick here to see Subject, Head Notes, Citation and Judgement
32SANTA SHARMA Vs. SUSHIL SHARMACoram: G.T.Nanavati, S.N.Phukan16/02/2000Hindu Marriage Act, 1955-Section 26-Custody of Minor children-Divorce proceedings initiated by husband in USA-During the pen-dency of the proceedings both husband and wife were living separately from each other in USA-American Court passed an inteAllowing the appeal, this Court HELD : 1.1. It will not be proper to be guided by the fact that the appellant had removed the children from U.S.A. despite the order of the Court of that country. So also, in view of the facts and circumstances ofClick here to see Subject, Head Notes, Citation and Judgement
33PADMJA SHARMA Vs. RATAN LAL SHARMACoram: D.P. WADHWA , M.B. SHAH28/03/2000Hindu Marriage Act, 1955/Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956/Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 : S.13/S.20 read with s.3(b) and s.26/s.125-Petition by wife for dissolu-tion of marriage-Applications under s.125 Cr.P.C. and s.26 of Hindu AdopAllowing the appeal in part, the Court HELD : 1.1. In view of s.20 of the Hindu Adoptions and Mainte-nance Act, 1956, a minor child can claim maintenance from his or her father or mother. Under this section it is as much the obligation of the faClick here to see Subject, Head Notes, Citation and Judgement
34LILY THOMAS, ETC. ETC. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.Coram: R.P.SETHI, S.S.AHMAD05/05/2000Constitution of India, 1950 : Article 20(1) : Review of Sarla Mudgal's case-Alleging violation of constitutional provisions-Held, not sustainable-The procedure established by law, as mentioned in Article 21 of the Constitution means the law presDisposing of the petitions, the Court HELD : Per R.P. Sethi, J. (Concurring) 1.1. Review is the creation of a statute. The power of review is not an inherent power. It must be conferred by law either specifically or by neces-sary implication. RClick here to see Subject, Head Notes, Citation and Judgemen

Comments