Sl No. | Title | Coram | Date of Judgement | Subject | HeadNotes | |
1 | STATE OF ORISSA Vs. SHARAT CHANDRA SAHU & ANR. | Coram: KULDIP SINGH, S. SAGHIR AHMAD | 08/10/1996 | Indian Penal Code, 1860 : Ss. 494 and 498A--Bigamy and dowry harassment-Women's Commis-sion sending the complaint of wife to police-Case against the husband for offences under ss. 494 and 498A registered and Charge-Sheet filed-Sub Divisional Ma | Held, High Court erred in quashing the charge-Judgment of High Court to that extent is set aside-Magistrate would proceed with the case. Held, if the facts reported to the police disclose both cognizable and non- cognizable offences the police w | Click here to see Subject, Head Notes, Citation and Judgement |
2 | PAWAN KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA | Coram: UMESH C. BANERJEE, K.G. BALAKRISHNAN | 13/03/2001 | Evidence Act, 1882 : Suicide-By married woman-Abetment of-Presumption as to-Dowry torture-Held : In the circumstance of the case, accused committed cruelty towards his deceased-wife-Hence, High Court rightly presumed accused abet-ted suicide of | Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD : 1.1. Success of the prosecution on the basis of circumstantial evidence will depend on the availability of a complete chain of events so as not to leave any doubt for the conclusion that the act must have | Click here to see Subject, Head Notes, Citation and Judgement |
3 | MILIND BHAGWANRAO GODSE Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. | Coram: DALVEER BHANDARI, HARJIT SINGH BEDI | 12/02/2009 | Penal Code, 1860 : Ss.498A, 306 and 109 r/w s.34 IPC - Dowry harassment - Mental torture - Suicide by wife - Husband convicted and sentenced by trial court - Upheld by High Court - On appeal, Held: The circumstances enumerated in the deceased's | Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. The evidence of P.W.6 (neighbour of the deceased), P.W.7 (sister of the deceased) and P.W.8 (father of the deceased) clearly lead to the only conclusion that this was a case of extreme mental cruelty whi | Click here to see Subject, Head Notes, Citation and Judgement |
4 | GOVINDARAJU Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA | Coram: V.S. SIRPURKAR, R.M. LODHA | 29/05/2009 | Penal Code, 1860 - s.304B - Death of woman within seven years of marriage - Demand of dowry and cruelty alleged - Charges u/s. 302, 304B, 201 r/w. 34 IPC - Acquittal by trial court - Conviction of husband u/s. 304B by High Court - On appeal, held: | Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. The judgment convicting the accused for the offence u/s. 304B IPC is correct. High Court has appreciated the evidence very deeply and the trial court had gravely erred in not accepting the evidence of PW | Click here to see Subject, Head Notes, Citation and Judgement |
1 |
Comments
Post a Comment