INDIAN CONTRACT ACT

Sl No.TitleCoramDate of JudgementSubjectHeadNotes 
61RANGANAYAKAMMA & ANR. Vs. K.S. PRAKASH (D) BY LRS. & ORS.Coram: S.B. SINHA, LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA16/05/2008Hindu Law: Joint family properties - Partition of through family settlement - Sisters relinquishing their rights in properties in favour of their brothers - Consent decree based on family settlement - HELD: A partition by meets and bounds may notDismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The source of title in respect of properties in suit is not in question, as the same have all along been treated as joint family properties by both the branches of `KS' through his two wives `S' and `V'.Click here to see Subject, Head Notes, Citation and Judgement
62DLF UNIVERSAL LTD. Vs. EKTA SETH & ANR.Coram: S.B. SINHA, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA15/07/2008Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969; S.12-B: Unfair trade practice - Compensation - Apartment Buyer's Agreement - Default in payment of instalment by buyer - Cancellation of allotment and earnest money forfeited - Application claiDisposing of the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The parties to the contract are governed and bound by the terms and conditions of the agreement entered into. In the case in hand though it cannot be denied that the respondents at the time of signingClick here to see Subject, Head Notes, Citation and Judgement
63PIMPRI CHINCHWAD MUNICIPAL CORP.& ORS. Vs. M/S GAYATRI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY & ANR.Coram: ARIJIT PASAYAT, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA06/08/2008Constitution of India, 1950; Article 226/Indian Contract Act, 1872: Writ petition in contractual matter - Maintainability of - Held: Not maintainable. Appellant and the respondents entered into an agreement for construction of road. There aroseAllowing the appeal, the Court HELD: The High Court ought not to have entertained the writ petition. It appears that by order dated 17.1.2007 interim stay of the impugned order was granted and was continued by order dated 12.2.2007. It is pointedClick here to see Subject, Head Notes, Citation and Judgement
64SIEMONS PUB.COMMUN.NETWROKS P.LD.& ANR. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.Coram: ARIJIT PASAYAT, C.K. THAKKER, LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA06/11/2008Constitution of India, 1950; Article 226: Government contracts - Tender - Award of contract - Administrative decision, judicial review of - Held: Evaluating tenders and awarding contracts are essentially commercial functions - When the decisionDismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1. In the composite price schedule in respect of Item No.11 of the bid document, appellant No. 1 endorsed the figure "1" in the column of "Quantity", and while filling in the price in the column of "UnitClick here to see Subject, Head Notes, Citation and Judgemen

Comments