1	JAGRAJ SINGH Vs. BIRPAL KAUR	Coram: C.K. THAKKER, LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA	13/02/2007	Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; ss. 13, 23(1)(2) and (3)/Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; O.III R.1; O.IX R.2; O.XXXII-A R.3: Divorce-Restitution of conjugal rights-Role of trial Court-Presence of parties in Court on date of hearing-Necessity of-Held: In	Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. Bald assertion of the appellant-husband that no Court of law can direct a party to remain personally present cannot be accepted. Apart from the matters under the Hindu Marriage Act, even in civil matters a	Click here to see Subject, Head Notes, Citation and Judgement
2	Smt. Mayadevi Vs. Jagdish Prasad	Coram: DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT, DALVEER BHANDARI	21/02/2007	Hindu Marriage Act, 1955-Divorce petition-On the ground of cruelty-By husband-Decree of divorce granted by courts below-On appeal, held: Facts of the case prove that the husband was subjected to mental and physical cruelty Hence, entitled to decree o	Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. The instances of cruelty highlighted by the trial Court and also by the High Court clearly prove that the husband was subjected to mental and physical cruelty. It is not a fact that the conviction in the c	Click here to see Subject, Head Notes, Citation and Judgement
3	DEEPAK JAIN Vs. CHARU JAIN	Coram: DR.AR.LAKSHMANAN, ALTAMAS KABIR	14/03/2007	Hindu Marriage Act, 1956: s.24 - Interim maintenance-Held, order of trial court granting Rs.12,000/- per month as interim maintenance and Rs.11,000/- as litigation expenses as affirmed by High Court suffers from no infirmity. The instant appeal	Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: The order under challenge suffers from no infirmity. The interim order passed by this Court on 17.2.2006 directing the appellant to pay a sum of Rs.8000/- per month to the respondent is vacated. The appella	Click here to see Subject, Head Notes, Citation and Judgemen